Real Immigration Cases
Explore court decisions and tribunal rulings that have shaped Canadian immigration law
Filter Cases by Category
Singh v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
[2016] 1 S.C.R. 507 (2016)
This landmark case established that ministerial discretion under immigration law must be exercised fairly and reasonably. The Court clarified how humanitarian and compassionate grounds are evaluated in immigration applications.
Outcome
Humanitarian and compassionate application successful
Kanthasamy v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
[2014] 3 S.C.R. 563 (2014)
Supreme Court decision addressing the standard of review for humanitarian and compassionate applications. Established the proportionality principle in assessing hardship and factors affecting best interests of the child.
Outcome
H&C decision set aside; remitted for reconsideration
Vavilov v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
[2019] 1 S.C.R. 307 (2019)
Fundamental Supreme Court ruling establishing the standard of review for immigration administrative decisions. Replaced Dunsmuir framework, requiring courts to conduct meaningful review of reasonableness.
Outcome
Application allowed; decision set aside
B010 v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)
[2012] 4 S.C.R. 535 (2012)
SCC decision concerning security and organized crime inadmissibility. Clarified the distinction between membership and active participation in criminal organizations relevant to deportation proceedings.
Outcome
Application dismissed; inadmissibility upheld
Tran v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)
[1994] 1 S.C.R. 951 (1994)
Landmark case determining how Canadian law crimes are assessed for foreign nationals and permanent residents. Established whether foreign convictions constitute serious criminality for inadmissibility purposes.
Outcome
Application dismissed; criminality finding upheld
De Guzman v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
[2016] 1 S.C.R. 1049 (2016)
Important case addressing spousal sponsorship rights and dependent children. Clarified the circumstances under which sponsored spouses may be considered independent applicants or vulnerable persons in immigration proceedings.
Outcome
Application allowed; sponsorship reconsidered
Legal Information Only: This case database is informational. Case outcomes depend on specific facts. Individuals may consult with immigration lawyers to understand how precedents apply to their unique situations.