Court & Tribunal Decisions

Real Immigration Cases

Explore court decisions and tribunal rulings that have shaped Canadian immigration law

Filter Cases by Category

Showing 6 cases

Singh v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)

[2016] 1 S.C.R. 507 (2016)

Humanitarian & Compassionate

This landmark case established that ministerial discretion under immigration law must be exercised fairly and reasonably. The Court clarified how humanitarian and compassionate grounds are evaluated in immigration applications.

Outcome

Humanitarian and compassionate application successful

Kanthasamy v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)

[2014] 3 S.C.R. 563 (2014)

Humanitarian & Compassionate

Supreme Court decision addressing the standard of review for humanitarian and compassionate applications. Established the proportionality principle in assessing hardship and factors affecting best interests of the child.

Outcome

H&C decision set aside; remitted for reconsideration

Vavilov v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)

[2019] 1 S.C.R. 307 (2019)

Standard of Review

Fundamental Supreme Court ruling establishing the standard of review for immigration administrative decisions. Replaced Dunsmuir framework, requiring courts to conduct meaningful review of reasonableness.

Outcome

Application allowed; decision set aside

B010 v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)

[2012] 4 S.C.R. 535 (2012)

Inadmissibility

SCC decision concerning security and organized crime inadmissibility. Clarified the distinction between membership and active participation in criminal organizations relevant to deportation proceedings.

Outcome

Application dismissed; inadmissibility upheld

Tran v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)

[1994] 1 S.C.R. 951 (1994)

Criminal Inadmissibility

Landmark case determining how Canadian law crimes are assessed for foreign nationals and permanent residents. Established whether foreign convictions constitute serious criminality for inadmissibility purposes.

Outcome

Application dismissed; criminality finding upheld

De Guzman v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)

[2016] 1 S.C.R. 1049 (2016)

Family Sponsorship

Important case addressing spousal sponsorship rights and dependent children. Clarified the circumstances under which sponsored spouses may be considered independent applicants or vulnerable persons in immigration proceedings.

Outcome

Application allowed; sponsorship reconsidered

Legal Information Only: This case database is informational. Case outcomes depend on specific facts. Individuals may consult with immigration lawyers to understand how precedents apply to their unique situations.

Ask AI